Skip to main content

Jane Austen and Magic

Hello friends, happy Friday!  Last week bumped the blog over the 2k view mark, which is awesome.  Thank you for reading and commenting!  (You should comment more!)


Anyway, today I'm reviewing Shades of Milk and Honey by Mary Robinette Kowal.  If you haven't read it, but her name is familiar, you may know her from the Writing Excuses podcast.  Yes, Shades came out in 2010, and I am a bit behind the curve ball, but let me explain.  When I started listening to the Writing Excuses podcast a year ago, I started waaaaayyy back at the beginning of the series, and Kowal didn't come on to the podcast until about July of last year, by my progress.  (I believe she actually came on as a permanent member back in 2011, but I cannot confirm for certain in the five minutes I spent combing their website.)  I loved everything Kowal was bringing to the podcast and I knew her work would be just as wonderful.  But I had excuses, so I didn't pick up her books.  When a friend asked me what I wanted for Christmas, I asked for Shades, the first in the Glamourist Histories by Kowal.  She kind of looked at me funny when she gave it to me.  "One of my friends wondered if it was like a Christian version of Fifty Shades of Grey," she said.  We laughed.  It is not.  Kowal herself pitches it as "Pride and Prejudice with magic," which is where today's headline comes from.

Shades is an historical fantasy/alternate history set in the regency era.  Some of the characters are able to use a type of magic called "glamour," whereby they can essentially fold light to create images and other sensations.  The magic has plenty of potential, as magic systems go, and Kowal explores many of these options in the following novels in the series. (I haven't gotten to them yet, but they're on the list, don't worry.)

The thing that should really strike you when you pick up this novel and start reading is the amount of work Kowal spent to make the novel feel like it was written in the regency era.  It's not enough for the characters to have the sensibilities that fans of Austen will be familiar with, it's not enough that the technologies represented are historically accurate, she took the time to make the narration of the novel period-correct.  Kowal said on Writing Excuses once that she compiled the entire works of Jane Austen, set them as her dictionary, and then ran spellcheck on her manuscript.  Can you imagine the amount of work necessary to find the right words?  Amazing.  Applause for her.

Jane, the main character of Shades, will also be familiar to Austen fans.  She is a young woman of middle-class means that is technically still young, but is past her "expiration date."  Her younger sister is the beauty, the toast of the local countryside, and Jane is often relegated to the role of chaperone.  Jane is smart and accomplished in "feminine arts," but the inclusion of magic in Kowal's world allows Jane another weapon to her arsenal, the art of glamour.  Granted, glamour is considered a feminine art, but it is novel to our perception of that world, so it deserves a mention.  Jane's glamourist abilities make her fearsome both in the parlor and in potentially compromising situations.

Another thing to love about Kowal's treatment of the classic Austen set-up is the "surprising yet inevitable" way she weaves her heroine's story in with the love interest.  I won't give it away, because I want you to read it, but, needless to say, Jane ends up with someone we grow to love, even though we fear she may choose someone else until very close to the end.

My only critique for this story is that many of the character names will feel familiar if you are a fan of Austen.  I think this is a very minor sin, however, and one that most will not even notice.

I care about historical fantasy and alternate history because I'm planning on writing one for my next novel!  I'll be sharing more about it as the year goes on.  As part of getting psyched up for this project, I'm going to see Mary Robinette Kowal in Houston in May when she's there for her book tour with Marie Brennan (who is on my reading list, since her Lady Trent works are also period fantasy and have to do with dragons).  You can view the dates and details of their tour here.

If you are a fan of Jane Austen or other regency novels, I recommend you check out Shades and the rest of the Glamourist Histories.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Non-Traditional Plot Structure

Happy Friday friends!  This post is about plot:  what we traditionally think of as plot, and what other options exist in the world. For starters, let's define the difference between plot and narrative structure.  Plot is (loosely) the events that happen in the story.  Narrative structure is the order readers experience the story events.  Ingrid Sundberg does a good job of differentiating the two here .  (May as well open that up in a new tab and leave it open, I'm going to be referencing her blog a lot today.   She's pretty much already done what I wanted to do with this post. ) If your public education was like mine, you were probably introduced to a figure similar to this somewhere in your English classes: Fritz Freiheit This is the standard plot that we can fit most stories into.  This describes a plot centered around conflict that follows a traditional three-act structure.  It's very popular.   In the Middle reviews a book ...

February Post

Give me a break, I hate coming up with titles. And the FCC spoke and said, 'Verily, I say unto thee, Verizon and their ilk shall not throttle the bandwidth of those they despise, nor shall they profit from the favoring of entities with greater bandwidth therein.' And there was great rejoicing.  And by great rejoicing, I mean that the internet blew up arguing about what color a dress was.  You go, America, exercise that freedom. Girls and boys, it's the last Friday in February and I haven't posted anything this month, so here goes. I'm so glad I didn't try to keep posting weekly, because school owns my life nowadays.  I approve of the once-a-month plan so far.  We'll see if I can do more posts during my summer break (i.e. the month of May). As you might have guessed, I have not done any editing on Om Nom Nombies.   I haven't written anything more on the first drafts of The Neif  or Spitfire.   I haven't even made any progress beta-ing a manusc...

Before We Begin

Hello friends!  This post is an argument for the prologue.   I've read comments on writing forums from fellow writers that say they hate prologues.   Orson Scott Card says he never reads prologues.  If so many people take issue with prologues, why do they even exist?  What purpose do they serve?  Let's first look at why prologues are hated. 1) Prologues are info-dumps     - Readers are picking up a book to read A STORY, not hear about all the worldbuilding the author has done.  Any worldbuilding or history that is important to the story can be interspersed within the story. 2) Prologues are flashbacks    - Ditto the worldbuilding comment above. 3) Prologues should just be re-named Chapter 1     - I can see this argument, but I think this should only be the case if main characters and storyline are introduced in the prologue. 4) Prologues are too long     - Anything more than a couple pages feels like t...