Skip to main content

Plantsing FTW

Hello Friends!

Today is the eighth day of NaNoWriMo, my current wordcount is 12,310.

There is lots of debate within the NaNo communtity about whether writers should be Planners (self-explanitory) or Pantsers (as in by-the-seat-of-your-pants).  Within the larger writing community you might recognize this as the difference between Outlining or Discovery Writing, or being an Architect vs. a Gardener.
jerry8448
I will not tell you that one method is better than another.  Different methods work best for different writers.  Different methods can even work for different projects by the same author!

My first NaNo, I started on Nov. 1st with one cool idea and half a plot. It was very difficult for me to get to the end of 50,000 words,.  I did it, but it was torture.  However, forcing myself to get those words down taught me what it is to build a scene off of a single uninspired sentence, and that is a skill I have been making good use of ever since.  Last year, I had a more solid outline, and I had a much easier time writing.  However, all I had was a chapter-by-chapter outline, so I got to discover all of my dialogue as I went.  This year for NaNoWriMo I did an extensive amount of planning.  I got my initial idea back in April, and ever since then I have been building characters, culture, and magic system, in addition to outlining a plot.

So, I was less excited going into this NaNo because I thought that all of my story was already planned out.  I figured all I would be doing was writing down all of the stuff that I had planned, so my story had lost all of its wonder for me.  I already knew the ending, I already knew how the world I had created worked, I already knew what needed to be said in the scenes, I felt like I was going to be walking a treadmill for the month of November.  Sure, I would feel good about what I had accomplished, and I would have done something great, but it wouldn't be all that exciting.

This week, I found out that I was wrong.

Yes, I had done an inordinate amount of planning.  And didn't mean that there was no room for pantsing as I was writing.  It meant there was a scaffolding to build upon.  All of my planning made a framework that I could organize my pantsing onto.  I wasn't constrained by my planning, I was directed by it.  And as a result, my patsing was so much more productive.  All the ideas that were coming to me while I wrote were relevant to my story!  They weren't just random ideas of what I would like my characters to do or talk about.  They were filling in plot holes, tying up ends, and mind blowing OMG moments!  Okay, I've only had one of those last ones, but there's only been one week in November so far, so maybe I'll get one a week, right?

Since I've started writing, I've tried a few different ways.  It turns out that I work best as a plantser!  This won't work for everyone, and it isn't how every capitol-A Author works, but it works for me.  Tell me about you?  What is your planning style, or do you even have one?  Any surprises as you are working on your NaNo this year?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Non-Traditional Plot Structure

Happy Friday friends!  This post is about plot:  what we traditionally think of as plot, and what other options exist in the world. For starters, let's define the difference between plot and narrative structure.  Plot is (loosely) the events that happen in the story.  Narrative structure is the order readers experience the story events.  Ingrid Sundberg does a good job of differentiating the two here .  (May as well open that up in a new tab and leave it open, I'm going to be referencing her blog a lot today.   She's pretty much already done what I wanted to do with this post. ) If your public education was like mine, you were probably introduced to a figure similar to this somewhere in your English classes: Fritz Freiheit This is the standard plot that we can fit most stories into.  This describes a plot centered around conflict that follows a traditional three-act structure.  It's very popular.   In the Middle reviews a book ...

February Post

Give me a break, I hate coming up with titles. And the FCC spoke and said, 'Verily, I say unto thee, Verizon and their ilk shall not throttle the bandwidth of those they despise, nor shall they profit from the favoring of entities with greater bandwidth therein.' And there was great rejoicing.  And by great rejoicing, I mean that the internet blew up arguing about what color a dress was.  You go, America, exercise that freedom. Girls and boys, it's the last Friday in February and I haven't posted anything this month, so here goes. I'm so glad I didn't try to keep posting weekly, because school owns my life nowadays.  I approve of the once-a-month plan so far.  We'll see if I can do more posts during my summer break (i.e. the month of May). As you might have guessed, I have not done any editing on Om Nom Nombies.   I haven't written anything more on the first drafts of The Neif  or Spitfire.   I haven't even made any progress beta-ing a manusc...

Before We Begin

Hello friends!  This post is an argument for the prologue.   I've read comments on writing forums from fellow writers that say they hate prologues.   Orson Scott Card says he never reads prologues.  If so many people take issue with prologues, why do they even exist?  What purpose do they serve?  Let's first look at why prologues are hated. 1) Prologues are info-dumps     - Readers are picking up a book to read A STORY, not hear about all the worldbuilding the author has done.  Any worldbuilding or history that is important to the story can be interspersed within the story. 2) Prologues are flashbacks    - Ditto the worldbuilding comment above. 3) Prologues should just be re-named Chapter 1     - I can see this argument, but I think this should only be the case if main characters and storyline are introduced in the prologue. 4) Prologues are too long     - Anything more than a couple pages feels like t...